ComparisonDemo data
Vireon V27-Q360 vs Norvik NX27-Q240
Both are 1440p QD-OLEDs. The V27-Q360 is faster at 360Hz; the NX27-Q240 adds USB-C charging and costs less to drive with a PC.
Demo data. Every product and brand listed here is fictional. Scores and measurements are illustrative values used to build the HannahRev templates — they are not laboratory results.
Biggest differences
- ErgonomicsBetter: V27-Q3608.3vs6.1
- Refresh RateBetter: V27-Q36010.0vs8.2
Side by side
Scores and key measurements. The better value in each row is marked.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 7.9 | 7.8 |
| PC Gaming | 8.7 | 8.4 |
| Console Gaming | 8.5 | 8.5 |
| Office | 6.8 | 6.5 |
| Editing | 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Screen size | 26.5 in | 26.5 in |
| Resolution | 2,560 × 1,440 | 2,560 × 1,440 |
| Panel type | QD-OLED | QD-OLED |
| Refresh rate | 360 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Response time (max refresh) | 0.3 ms | 0.4 ms |
| Input lag (max refresh) | 1.2 ms | 1.6 ms |
| Native contrast | ∞ : 1 | ∞ : 1 |
| SDR brightness (real scene) | 250 cd/m² | 265 cd/m² |
| HDR brightness (real scene) | 440 cd/m² | 455 cd/m² |
| DCI-P3 coverage | 98.2% | 98.2% |
| Colour accuracy (dE) | 1.20 | 1.20 |
| Text clarity | 7.1 / 10 | 7.0 / 10 |
| Coating | Glossy | Glossy |
| USB-C charging | Not applicable | 65 W |
Every test score
Each score links to the matching test in that product’s review.
Design
| Test | V27-Q360 | NX27-Q240 |
|---|---|---|
| Build Quality | 8.3 | 8.5(better) |
| Ergonomics | 8.3(better) | 6.1 |
Picture Quality
| Test | V27-Q360 | NX27-Q240 |
|---|---|---|
| Contrast | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Local Dimming | — | — |
| SDR Brightness | 4.4 | 4.9(better) |
| HDR Brightness | 3.0 | 3.2(better) |
| Gray Uniformity | 7.5 | 7.5 |
| Black Uniformity | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Color Accuracy | 8.5 | 8.5 |
| SDR Color Gamut | 9.4 | 9.4 |
| HDR Color Volume | 6.5 | 6.5 |
| Viewing Angle | 9.9 | 9.9 |
| Text Clarity | 7.1(better) | 7.0 |
| Reflections | 4.6 | 5.0(better) |
| Gradient | 8.3 | 8.5(better) |